Reports from Kenya
Report
#111
June 30, 2009
The Commonality of Genocide
In 1995
when my daughter, Joy, was researching her book, "The Pigment
of Your Imagination" (www.ThePigment.com), she wanted me to visit
her in Africa. I replied that to do this I needed "adventure".
So we decided to go overland from Nairobi, Kenya to Harare, Zimbabwe.
For part of this trip we took the Tazara Railroad from Dar-es-Salaam,
Tanzania to near Lusaka, Zambia. For about 100 miles of this train ride
we went through the Selous Game Reserve.
In college I majored
in African history and knew that in 1905 this "wild" area
was full of prosperous villages. From 1905 to 1907 these villagers revolted
against the German rule of then German East Africa in the Maji-Maji Rebellion.
The Germans responded with a brutal genocide. They attacked the villages,
killing people and animals and destroying homes and fields. Their method
of obtaining subjection of the people was "famine". Those people
who had been living in the Selous Game Reserve either perished or moved
elsewhere. The area became depopulated and the tsetse moved into the
newly growing bush. Tsetse flies bring sleeping sickness to both people
and cows; even today there are large sections in Africa that are uninhabited
because of the tsetse fly. As the tsetse fly moved in people were unable
to re-establish their villages, farms, and communities. The bush thrived,
the wild animals returned, and Selous Game Reserve is one of the biggest
reserves in Tanzania, larger than the better known Serengeti Plains.
This is only one of the many genocides in Africa during this time. In
German Southwest Africa (now Namibia) the Herero also revolted. The Germans
pushed the 80,000 Herero into the Kalahari Desert where most perished.
Those who attempted to return to the highlands from the desert were just
shot dead. Only 3000 Herero survived this genocide.
The Germans were
not the only ones. The British in Kenya used the same tactics against
the Kalenjin and Masai groups; killing the men in battle,
destroying the villages and fields of those in rebellion so that many,
including women and children, died of hunger and disease. Their land
was then opened up for White settlement (called the "White Highlands")
and is one of the underlying causes of the current unrest in Kenya. The
French did similar campaigns in West Africa and the Belgians were noted
for their extreme brutality in the Congo.
These days we are used to annual increases in population. But from the
beginning of the scramble for Africa in the mid 1880's until the end
of the pacification of the various rebellions by 1910, the population
in the area of the Congo, Uganda, Rwanda, Tanzania, Rwanda, and Burundi
is estimated to have been cut in half. In 1886 when King Leopold took
over the Congo there were an estimated 10,000,000 people, but by the
time the personal fiefdom was taken from him in 1908, the population
had declined to an estimated 5,000,000.
While the extent of continuous wars due to the slave trade are frequently
mentioned as a major destabilizing factor over 400 years of African history,
it is rarely noted how destructive the conquest of Africa by the colonial
rulers was. As is known from the plagues in Europe, when
large numbers of people die in a society there are profound negative
consequences to the society.
When war brings the destruction of homes, villages, and communities,
when people are dying from war-induced starvation and disease, a society
becomes traumatized and loses its cohesiveness.
Were these various
genocides just random acts? I have just finished reading Sven Lindqvist's "'Exterminate All the Brutes': One Man's
Odyssey into the Heart of Darkness and the Origins of European Genocide." Lindqvist
is a Swede who is exploring the connection between these
genocides in Africa and the Holocaust in Europe. His opening paragraph
reads, "You already know enough. So do I. It is not knowledge we
lack. What is missing is the courage to understand what we know and to
draw conclusions".
By page 141 he writes
(the book was written before the Rwandan genocide): "It
is we who have suppressed it. We do not want to remember. We want genocide
to have begun and ended with Nazism. That is what is most comforting."
In addition to the
historical examples, Lindqvist gives the intellectual history that
made genocide "respectible". This was Darwin's
Descent of Man and the concept of the survival of the fittest. The white
rulers of all the European countries believed in a hierarchy of race.
The superior race – the white race – would overwhelm the
inferior races. The European conquest of the United States and Canada
was a prime example of this. The extermination of the Tasmanians in Australia
might be regrettable, but an evolutionary necessity. Darwin himself was
in Argentina and saw the European settlers go out into the pampas and
murder any Native American that was found so that the pampas could be
opened up for European settlement. According to late 19th century race
theory, the white race was destined to expand throughout the world, even,
for example, obliterating the Chinese "race". The point was
that the superior race needed land in order to expand and would seize
this from the inferior races. Consequently, since it was inevitable,
genocide was normal as lower races were exterminated. All European nations
subscribed to this racial interpretation of history.
After World War I
Germany lost its overseas colonies. Yet Germany kept the same racial
theories. Germany's expansion would not be overseas,
but in Europe itself. Slavs like Poles and Ukrainians would be used as
labor and would eventually die out to the superior Germans. Clearly Gypsies
and Jews were an inferior people because they did not control any territory
of their own – a clear sign of an inferior race. So like the Herero
in German Southwest Africa, like the Native Americans in Argentina and
the United States, like so many other examples, the Jewish and Gypsy
population would be exterminated and in time the other ethnic groups
in Central Europe would also decline as the master German race dominated
from the Atlantic Ocean to the Ural Mountains.
In Sven Lingqvist's opinion, to see the World War II Holocaust as an
isolated, unique event is to ignore and re-write European history. While
the defeat of Germany in World War II discredited this racial hierarchical
theory, if you listen closely you can still hear echoes in today's discourse,
particularly where Africa is concerned.
Previous |
Next
Report: 1 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 |60
| 70
|
80 | 90
| 100
|
107 | 108 | 109 |
110 | 112